Email html gnu program

Copyleft guarantees that every user has freedom. Copyleft also provides an incentive for other programmers to add to free software. Copyleft also helps programmers who want to contribute improvements to free software get permission to do that. These programmers often work for companies or universities that would do almost anything to get more money. A programmer may want to contribute her changes to the community, but her employer may want to turn the changes into a proprietary software product.

When we explain to the employer that it is illegal to distribute the improved version except as free software, the employer usually decides to release it as free software rather than throw it away. To copyleft a program, we first state that it is copyrighted; then we add distribution terms, which are a legal instrument that gives everyone the rights to use, modify, and redistribute the program's code or any program derived from it but only if the distribution terms are unchanged.

Thus, the code and the freedoms become legally inseparable. Proprietary software developers use copyright to take away the users' freedom; we use copyright to guarantee their freedom. Copyleft is a general concept; there are many ways to fill in the details. Please note that you must use the entire text of the GPL, if you use it. It is an integral whole, and partial copies are not permitted. Using the same distribution terms for many different programs makes it easy to copy code between various different programs.

Since they all have the same distribution terms, there is no need to think about whether the terms are compatible. We believe that published software and documentation should be free software and free documentation. For essays of opinion and scientific papers, we recommend either the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3. We don't take the position that artistic or entertainment works must be free, but if you want to make one free, we recommend the Free Art License.

We defend the rights of all software users. Email is a key service we provide. Besides it being one of the FSF campaigns and licensing teams' most important ways of communicating, we also support thousands of mailing lists for other free software projects, which send millions of emails per year. Free software is extremely capable in all aspects of email, and there continue to be innovative advancements in free software email programs that we are excited to explore and adopt.

Email is designed to be federated by domain. If you use someone else's domain for email, you have to use their server. Whoever controls a domain's email server can see everything that's in any email sent through it. You can take measures to defend yourself by keeping your email private by encrypting it.

We maintain the Email Self-Defense Guide to show you how to do that. As a communication service, an email server does not take away your freedom like Service as a Software Substitute SaaSS does. However, a service could come with a condition that makes you run nonfree software. This is why we, together with volunteers , maintain a page about Webmail Systems that can be used in freedom. In the end, running your own email server for your own domain gives you the maximum amount of freedom and control over your email.

The next best thing is to use an email server run using free software by an organization or group of friends you trust. At the heart of the FSF's email servers is a mail transfer agent called Exim. One of Exim's key functions is to send email to and receive email from other email servers on the Internet. Over many years, the Exim project has done a wonderful job of advancing its capabilities and maintaining superb documentation.

You use Gmail client in your webbrowser and the 'client-ware' resides in the Google cloud, you do not install anything on your desktop or home or company Intranet.

In order to use an 'alternative' you need installing the whole infrastructure. If you want to use it everywhere - you have to expose it in the Internet, which always brings security threats. Otherwise - you are bounded to your Intranet. Hosting your own email server to take back control of your privacy and data isn't that difficult at all. Many small businesses have or can get decent connectivity, at least in metropolitan areas, and can get a public IP so they could setup their own services knowing nothing or very little about Linux by using platforms like ClearOS, Univention or Collax to mention a few on top of which they can install with a few clicks a replacement for GMail.

True that it's more convenient to use "Cloud" services as it's convenient to let other people decide for you but then they can't complain if their data gets lost or is used against them. This article is misleading for sure and misses the point a lot. However, an Open Source Alternative to this implies that you will host it yourself somewhere so you provide the cloud.

If you setup a mail server and then one of these clients then you don't have to install anything locally and install you just use the web versions of these clients. This article skips the Mail Server part which is easily the most important thing and that is unfortunate.

You can't connect Rainloop to a server that doesn't exist. This was not a very well thought out article. Kopano is available in Debian, Ubuntu, OpenSuse and Fedora repositories, as source code and as packages ready to use for most Linux distributions. I miss zohomail from this list. Now, talking about roundcube, squirrel, made me travel back in time, really.

These things are soooo I remember more than 10 years ago people telling me to use roundcube because it was made using AJAX Although those tools are still available and have modern install methods like iredmail, how would you make your clamav and spamassassin good as Gmail's antivirus and antispam. Sum up with greylisting, content filtering, the amazing interface and filters Sometimes you have to leverage your things to available free tools and focus on what it matters.

And if your email is too important to be handled by google like as if you are a government or something, I would go for a paid solution like IBM email or try out with zimbra and zoho.

It would be great if the author went further than writing a superficial description of these mail clients. It is obvious he has not tried some of the applications, at least not recently.

Doesn't he know, for example, that SquirrelMail is currently a dormant project? This is not really an alternative to GMail because you only covered the client side of things so you still need an email server which this article doesn't address at all.

I think it's hilarious that pretty much all of the complaints on this article are from people who clearly didn't read it. Is this a repost?

Yes, it says at the bottom it was originally posted two years ago and updated. Do you still need an email server to use with your webmail client? Yes, the author literally says that in the second paragraph. I agree with some of the later comments, that perhaps the article needs a little more depth. Especially, if you're a Gmail user, why would you want another email client? Are you trying to consolidate email?

Or are you looking for a better user experience? If so, what are the advantages of getting away from webmail to, say, a native client? And there was a comment about the article being incomplete since it does not include mail servers and this may be true too. I recently switching my hosting from GoDaddy to another company and quickly realized that their webmail client was actually pretty good with the exception of using HTML messages with images where I had a lot of problems as I use this often.

I settled on Roundcube but it feels dated and has some limitations I had to get used to also, most notable with use of bcc: which I use extensively in conjunction with Highrise.

I'm trying to see if any of these other clients may be a better fit. Could be useful in some situations. Running a secure email server these days is a full-time job. No ads or snooping through my e-mail content by a "big-brother" hosting service like Google or Yahoo.

Explore the world of open source alternatives to Gmail as you discover several options for free webmail clients to manage your inbox. Image by :. Judith E. Modified by Opensource. Get the highlights in your inbox every week. Do you use a webmail client? Choices Yes, I use Gmail or another proprietary tool. Yes, I use an open source webmail client.

No, I prefer a desktop or command-line client. More Great Content. Topics Email. About the author. Jason Baker - I use technology to make the world more open. Linux desktop enthusiast. Raspberry Pi tinkerer. Data analysis and visualization geek.

Occasional coder. GNU packages are occasionally decommissioned, generally because they've been superseded by, or integrated into, other packages. Here is the list; we leave the old project pages up when they existed :. We defend the rights of all software users. There are also other ways to contact the FSF. Set language. Copyright Infringement Notification.